Author: André L. Belleville
Earlier this week, I had the privilege of reconnecting with a former team member whom I interviewed about a decade ago. In this particular case, I was his skip-level manager. Our recent phone conversation sparked laughter as we reminisced about our first interaction when he was interviewing for a consulting position. He recalled my reputation as an assertive interviewer, perhaps the toughest of them all. According to him, my demeanor was inscrutable, with no apparent cues from my body language. He recounted the lack of a standard against which to measure his performance during the interview. I was the one who presented unconventional and challenging interview questions designed to provoke deep insights. My approach was to decipher nuances and subtleties in the answers. I occasionally posed disagreements to elicit authentic responses. My focus was less on the candidate's actual answer and more on their reactionary behavior. I sought to decipher the potential in these responses - potential that held the key to what I was seeking. It is plausible that individuals with memories of that era still perceive me as a particularly demanding interviewer to overcome. Importantly, I had no intention of putting candidates in an uncomfortable position or using my role to manipulate them. My underlying goal was always to ground candidates to give them a sense of what reality would they be to expect. This exchange of realities was mutual; candidates gained insight into the inner workings, and I, in turn, discerned the subtleties beneath their responses.
The dynamics of interviews for top-level positions have evolved significantly. As an executive headhunter, I've transitioned into a role that bridges the gap between candidates and clients. I guide both sides toward the realization that traditional examination methods no longer suffice. While credentials and documents are essential, they only provide a fragment of the narrative. The crucial missing piece is the emotional connection. An interview is now a meaningful dialogue, not a monologue of resumes. It transpires in a respectful and transparent setting, involving the candidate, the hiring manager, and the HR business partner.
From Assessment to Understanding
Candidates I approach are typically content in their current roles, requiring a refined approach to engagement. The era of surprising candidates with demanding scenarios has given way to fostering genuine communication. Interviews with C-level executives have shifted focus from identifying weaknesses to nurturing mutual understanding. The interview format itself has transformed into a two-way exchange, granting insights on a personal level.
The Modern Interview
Today's interviews are marked by reciprocity. Candidates don't just arrive with answers but with questions that reflect their curiosity about company culture, role expectations, and organizational vision. My role as a headhunter has evolved into that of a coach and consultant. I empower candidates to approach interviews as idea exchanges, building trust and transparency. This environment enables candidates to naturally exhibit their skills and aspirations.
My task is to facilitate productive conversations that enable both clients and candidates to grasp the essence of each opportunity. The modern interview revolves around fostering understanding, trust, and synergy between all stakeholders involved.
The evolution of C-level interviews is exemplary of broader changes in recruitment practices. From the era of rigorous examination to the present emphasis on meaningful dialogue, the interview landscape has transformed to better suit the needs of both candidates and clients. As an executive headhunter, I've shifted from being a strict evaluator to a facilitator of conversations that build bridges between exceptional talent and visionary organizations. Through this transformation, I've learned that it's not just about assessing qualifications—it's about fostering connections, nurturing potential, and propelling businesses toward unparalleled success.